Evergreen Anderson illustrates irrelevance of age in Test cricket

As Jimmy Anderson took another 5- wicket haul at the age of 37, he declared that his age was irrelevant and that he felt in good shape and fit. And in fact, whereas some sports make such physical demands on the body that once you get into your mid-thirties you are just not able to take the hits in rugby or the 14km running and tackling in football, or rather you are, but are not able to compete successfully with people 15 years younger, in cricket this is far less the case.
Clearly, you need to have kept your passion for the game in order to be motivated to make the effort and after 20 years of throwing them down, sometimes that might understandably fade a little.
You need stamina to bat, at least you do if you’re planning to stick around for a long knock, but a good fitness regime can give you that. You need good eyesight but 20/20 vision is available to everyone these days. You need explosive energy to be a fast bowler but only in very short bursts. Obviously, you do get rest after every delivery and after each over. The exertions are not continuous. Actually, if you’re a spinner, the exertions are pretty minimal unless you count strolling from long on to turn your arm over off a five step run up every other over exerting.
Like Anderson, you need to keep yourself in good physical condition and have a post-game recovery strategy but given these things are in place, why shouldn’t we see more players extending their Test careers into their 40s on a more regular basis? Their experience and wisdom is invaluable.
Cricket, perhaps more than most sports tends to be mastered via experience. Whereas a young footballer might burst on the scene at 17, by 23 he’s often pretty much set in how he plays. 27 was traditionally said to be a footballer’s peak but that’s probably more like 25 now. However, a 25-year old cricketer is really only just getting started. So many players get better in their 30s. Is Anderson a provably worse or less effective bowler now than 10 years ago? No way. He was ranked No.2 in the ICC Test Bowling Rankings a year ago.
Ageism is the last bigotry that won’t get you caught up in a Twitter storm and outlawed from decent society, the way some other isms will. Making negative judgments on someone based on age, is rife in society. You see it everywhere. ‘Old’ is never used as a positive, always a negative, usually as part of an incentive. It is a put-down.
All too often, we fail to understand that 40-year-olds in 2020, born in 1980 are not like 40-year-olds of yore. You only have to look at photos of cricketers of yore to understand how physically different they are after a lifetime of fitness training, gym work and appropriate diet.
Anderson looks absolutely strapping and could pass for ten years younger, but he’s not unique in this now. I do wonder if sometimes the ambitions of cricketers are inhibited by their age and by the assumption that their powers must be waning. Or perhaps that is how they are viewed as a de facto judgement based on their age. In other words because people always used to retire in their late 30s, that’s still just what you do.
Anderson is clearly challenging that. Devon Smith is also now over 38 and still playing Test cricket. But there have been plenty of older cricketers over the years. Geoff Boycott was 41 when he played his last Test as was Ray Illingworth. Brian Close was 45 when he faced the Windies in 1976, Wilf Rhodes played on until 52 in 1930 and while you can argue those were very different days indeed, he simply must’ve been more than capable to lay a bat on a ball at the highest level on the uncovered, uneven pitches of the day.
While it may be a bit extreme to play your first Test aged 49, as James Southernton did in the 19th century, England would be far less of a side without Anderson and while that remains the case, his age really is irrelevant.
Latest
-
England
Jack Leach enjoying life in ‘extremely positive’ England set-up
Leach’s first 10-wicket Test match haul and half-centuries from Ollie Pope and Joe Root have left England on course for a 3-0 series win.
-
County Cricket
Hashim Amla and Ben Geddes hit hundreds as Surrey take control against Kent
The pair produced a third-wicket stand of 213 after the hosts were asked to bat.
-
England
Jack Leach career-best puts England on course for New Zealand series whitewash
Spinner Leach took 10 wickets in a Test match for the first time.
-
England
New-look England set for ‘exciting time’ as they gear up for South Africa Test
The absence of Katherine Brunt and Anya Shrubsole has opened the door for new faces to make their mark.
-
England
England set 296 for series sweep as Jack Leach claims first 10-wicket Test haul
Leach finished with second-innings figures of five for 66 as New Zealand were bowled out for 326.
-
England
England thwarted by Daryl Mitchell and Tom Blundell again at Headingley
England drew a blank over the course of two difficult hours on Sunday.
-
News
Ben Foakes replaced by Sam Billings at Headingley after positive Covid-19 test
Foakes did not take the field on the third afternoon against New Zealand after complaining of back pain.
-
England
Jamie Overton happy to entertain on rollercoaster England Test debut
The pace bowler fell three runs short of a remarkable century at Headingley.
-
England
England have Headingley buzzing again as late burst rocks New Zealand
The tourists will resume on Sunday 137 runs ahead with five wickets down.
-
England
Jamie Overton falls just short of debut century for England in tight third Test
Overton was caught behind for 97 in the morning session.