Root’s woes at three highlight numbers game behind batting line-up
I may be alone in this, but in any game of cricket, I’ve always been fascinated by the batting order and of the relative status and identity of each position. Fascinated also by what the line-up says about each player.
It is one of the game’s more mystical, vague and yet crucially important elements. There should be and probably are, books written about the different aspects of each position on the scorecard.
Are you an opener, or a number three? Maybe you’re a number six. The numbers are assigned a kind of mythical status. They become identified with certain players.
Look at all the fuss about whether Joe Root should go in at three or four. Root sees himself as a four but Trevor Bayliss thinks he’s a three. However, the stats suggest he does better at five averaging 71. So what does it all mean really?
Okay, Bayliss’ theory is based on Root being England’s best batter so he can impose himself on the innings at first wicket down. But how that might happen varies greatly depending on the specific instance. If England’s opening partnership is 150 before the first dismissal, that’s a whole different gig to coming in at 2/1. Root seems to feel like being a four gives him time to psychologically settle as the innings gets under way. The counter argument to that is if two early wickets go down, the pressure is really on him to make sure the innings doesn’t collapse.
- Here’s the thing with the nightwatchman: it’s absolute b*llocks
- The Ashes helps to define what it is to be English and Australian
- Freakish World Cup one-off won’t bring the legion of new fans cricket needs
- Sky’s free-to-air World Cup final move welcome, but why now?
So clearly, generalising how to play in any position only gets you so far because the variables of circumstance are so huge, which is one of the game’s great pleasures, of course.
Bayliss also thinks Root coming in at three would allow Jason Roy to drop down to four. To me, this never feels right. An opener is an opener is an opener. It’s a role in life as much as in a cricket match, isn’t it? That’s what I was brought up to believe, anyway. Openers are brave, solid types made of granite and snot. They should also be selfish, bloody-minded and square-jawed bastards who have their life’s philosophy set on ‘f**k-you-and-all-who-sail-in-you.’ The idea that this sort of batter can be put down to four seems a crime against all that is decent.
I think what this shows is so much to do with where you feel comfortable batting is psychological and maybe that’s the most important thing of all. It’s all part of your internal narrative.
- Liebke & Bowden’s Ridiculous Ashes – Second Test: The Smith & Archer Show
- Archer’s thrilling debut changes everything and nothing
- How Australia v England became Steve Smith v Jofra Archer
Personally, I never felt I was an opening bat. I’m too flakey, too liable to want to do something creative and dangerous and get out doing so. In my head, I’m a classic flashing blade, most happy at six pushing the score on quickly, or rescuing an early collapse; the fulcrum of the innings. That sort of role really appeals to me. You don’t have to sit in the hutch with your pads on from the get-go, you can put your feet up on the balcony for a while and watch the first four setting the tone of the innings. So by the time you come in, the game’s narrative is already written. You’ve also had a chance to see what the opposition is delivering in terms of bowling, how the pitch is playing and what the weather is likely to be. All of this makes life so much easier.
Somehow, you start to self-identify with a set number and so to be shifted from that feels alien and unnatural somehow. And as observers we feel that too. I vividly recall seeing Geoff Boycott come in at six for a one-day game in the 1970s and it felt like a sin against all that is natural to see him come in that low. Similarly, pushing mid-order batters up to open the innings feels wrong somehow, like brushing a cat’s fur the wrong way.
Funny business, isn’t it? On the surface, each batter is there to do the same thing: score runs. While sometimes you need to score quickly and sometimes you need to just keep in, you wouldn’t think there was that much difference between any position at all really. But there absolutely is.
Steve Smith debate has been “blown up” says England all-rounder Chris Woakes
The former Australia captain was filmed scratching at the batting crease while fielding against India.
Moeen Ali coronavirus quarantine extended after mild symptoms
The England all-rounder is now unlikely to feature in England’s Test series in Sri Lanka.
Australia go on the defensive over Steve Smith scuffing saga
Australia have closed ranks around Steve Smith, who is upset over being painted as a villain following the drawn third Test against India.
On This Day in 1996: Dickie Bird announces retirement from umpiring
Bird umpired in 66 Tests and 69 one-day internationals.
Dan Lawrence adamant he will stick to ‘unique’ batting technique in Test arena
The 23-year-old should make his Test debut when England start their two-match series against Sri Lanka.
Steve Smith criticised for appearing to scuff Rishabh Pant’s guard in third Test
Former Australia captain Steve Smith was branded “childish” after an incident during the final day of their drawn third Test against India
Tim Paine admits he let the Australian bowlers down
Australia captain Tim Paine believes he was at least partially to blame for his side failing to bowl India.
Testing times on tour in Sri Lanka – the life of an international cricketer
Gloucestershire’s James Bracey is on his first overseas tour with England. Here he writes about his experiences so far in Sri Lanka.
India salvage unlikely draw in third Test against Australia
India salvaged an unlikely draw as the third Test against Australia reached a thrilling finale.